Consultation

On the 12th of July 2008 we held a public consultation at Stirchley Community Centre. We asked local residents to tell us what they wanted to see in the area and here are the results:

People would like more open spaces, including improvements to existing parks and the River Rea walkway. They also wanted to see an expansion of the allotments, perhaps even some kind of community agriculture/market garden that would be better connected to the centre of Stirchley.  A public square away from the traffic and linked to green areas was also suggested, as well as an outdoor multi-sports area that could be booked by local residents. It was also felt there should be an area suitable for community festivals/outdoor music and more public information about local history.

 

Suggested improvements to the environment for young children and families included more pedestrian crossings, safety railings, traffic calming and lower speed limits. Improved facilities included play/sport schemes, a play centre or multi-use play area as well as safer parks and open spaces.

 

When considering local teenagers and young people many people thought that a dedicated youth centre would be beneficial. It was felt they needed a place where they could come together to study, as well as chat/socialise and gain access to support and advice. Others felt that improvements to local sports facilities and clubs were essential. A multi-sports area was again suggested as well as a skate park and more evening activities and classes.

 

As for older people contributors want to see enhanced access to open spaces and a drop in centre or meeting place with tea and coffee rooms. They also wanted ‘somewhere nice to take the grandchildren’.

 

In terms of the community at large one of the most popular suggestions was a swimming pool and a sports centre/gym. They also wanted to see an expansion of the library, as well as more community groups and evening classes to include such activities as fitness lesson or courses in photography. A community arts centre was also suggested.

 

Improved independent retail that would give Stirchley an identity was very important to local people.  Suggestions included smaller, independent shops with a focus on local traders; restaurants, cafes and bars; building on the DIY/hardware reputation/tradition of Stirchley; more local butchers and green grocers; a weekly market or farmers market; a pedestrian high street/square with retail; craft village type shops; focused business support, plans and incentives for derelict shops. Better and more affordable housing was also high on the agenda, as well as improvements to the built environment focusing on the conservation of historic buildings.

 

Although this was intended as a constructive exercise there was massive concern about traffic, especially on the Pershore Road. Many were worried that a big new development would be disastrous for the already gridlocked road system and would increase local pollution. Suggestions for improvements included big support for cycle lanes and cycle racks, as well as an improved bus service to close suburbs such as Moseley and Harborne. Contributors also wanted to see stricter enforcement of rules concerning shops loading on the Pershore road, a greater effort to tackle ‘rat runs’ (such as on Ribblesdale Road), road widening, off-road parking for local shops and more pedestrian areas.

 

For pictures and more about the day take a look at the post ‘Residents Have Their Say’.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

3 Responses to “Consultation”

RSS Feed for Another Stirchley Is Possible Comments RSS Feed

The creation of a huge superstore, when one already exists is not regeneration. The Midlands Co-op/Helical proposal would have brought greater choice to the town, however BCC is minded that it’s going to support Tesco regardless of the fact it does little to enhance Stirchley.

More cars, congestion, duplication of supermarket ranges, closure of small independent businesses and another town that looks like every other that contains a Tesco-shaped blot on the landscape is hardly great for Stirchley.

I suspect BCC isn’t actually bothered about actual regeneration. How many times have we heard of Tesco paying for fire stations and leisure centres to be moved and rebuilt elsewhere in order to make way for a new hypermarket. The less the council has to pay for so called regeneration, the better it looks for the councillors. Hogwash if you ask me, it’s all about scratching each others’ backs with brown envelopes choc full of banknotes (allegedly).


Where's The Comment Form?

    About

    Another Stirchley Is Possible is an action group set up by concerned local residents to oppose the planned Tesco retail development and to campaign for a better alternative

    RSS

    Subscribe Via RSS

    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Add your feed to Newsburst from CNET News.com
    • Subscribe in Google Reader
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • The latest comments to all posts in RSS

    Meta

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: