<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consultation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anotherstirchley.wordpress.com/our-vision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anotherstirchley.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Another Stirchley Is Possible is an action group set up by concerned local residents to oppose the planned Tesco retail development and to campaign for a better alternative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:36:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craven Moorehead</title>
		<link>http://anotherstirchley.wordpress.com/our-vision/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craven Moorehead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherstirchley.wordpress.com/?page_id=27#comment-48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The creation of a huge superstore, when one already exists is not regeneration.  The Midlands Co-op/Helical proposal would have brought greater choice to the town, however BCC is minded that it&#039;s going to support Tesco regardless of the fact it does little to enhance Stirchley.  

More cars, congestion, duplication of supermarket ranges, closure of small independent businesses and another town that looks like every other that contains a Tesco-shaped blot on the landscape is hardly great for Stirchley.

I suspect BCC isn&#039;t actually bothered about actual regeneration.  How many times have we heard of Tesco paying for fire stations and leisure centres to be moved and rebuilt elsewhere in order to make way for a new hypermarket.  The less the council has to pay for so called regeneration, the better it looks for the councillors.  Hogwash if you ask me, it&#039;s all about scratching each others&#039; backs with brown envelopes choc full of banknotes (allegedly).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The creation of a huge superstore, when one already exists is not regeneration.  The Midlands Co-op/Helical proposal would have brought greater choice to the town, however BCC is minded that it&#8217;s going to support Tesco regardless of the fact it does little to enhance Stirchley.  </p>
<p>More cars, congestion, duplication of supermarket ranges, closure of small independent businesses and another town that looks like every other that contains a Tesco-shaped blot on the landscape is hardly great for Stirchley.</p>
<p>I suspect BCC isn&#8217;t actually bothered about actual regeneration.  How many times have we heard of Tesco paying for fire stations and leisure centres to be moved and rebuilt elsewhere in order to make way for a new hypermarket.  The less the council has to pay for so called regeneration, the better it looks for the councillors.  Hogwash if you ask me, it&#8217;s all about scratching each others&#8217; backs with brown envelopes choc full of banknotes (allegedly).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RESIDENTS HAVE THEIR SAY &#171; Another Stirchley Is Possible</title>
		<link>http://anotherstirchley.wordpress.com/our-vision/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RESIDENTS HAVE THEIR SAY &#171; Another Stirchley Is Possible]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherstirchley.wordpress.com/?page_id=27#comment-22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Consultation [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Consultation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HEAVY PRICE FOR RESTORED BATHS &#171; Another Stirchley Is Possible</title>
		<link>http://anotherstirchley.wordpress.com/our-vision/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HEAVY PRICE FOR RESTORED BATHS &#171; Another Stirchley Is Possible]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherstirchley.wordpress.com/?page_id=27#comment-21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Consultation [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Consultation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
